SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2409.20314

Faster algorithms for packing forests in graphs and related problems

Abstract

We consider several problems related to packing forests in graphs. The first one is to find $k$ edge-disjoint forests in a directed graph $G$ of maximal size such that the indegree of each vertex in these forests is at most $k$. We describe a min-max characterization for this problem and show that it can be solved in almost linear time for fixed $k$, extending the algorithm of [Gabow, 1995]. Specifically, the complexity is $O(k \delta m \log n)$, where $n, m$ are the number of vertices and edges in $G$ respectively, and $\delta = \max\{1, k - k_G\}$, where $k_G$ is the edge connectivity of the graph. Using our solution to this problem, we improve complexities for two existing applications: (1) $k$-forest problem: find $k$ forests in an undirected graph $G$ maximizing the number of edges in their union. We show how to solve this problem in $O(k^3 \min\{kn, m\} \log^2 n + k \cdot{\rm MAXFLOW}(m, m) \log n)$ time, breaking the $O_k(n^{3/2})$ complexity barrier of previously known approaches. (2) Directed edge-connectivity augmentation problem: find a smallest set of directed edges whose addition to the given directed graph makes it strongly $k$-connected. We improve the deterministic complexity for this problem from $O(k \delta (m+\delta n)\log n)$ [Gabow, STOC 1994] to $O(k \delta m \log n)$. A similar approach with the same complexity also works for the undirected version of the problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pavel Arkhipov, Vladimir Kolmogorov. 2024-09-30. Faster algorithms for packing forests in graphs and related problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.20314

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS