SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2410.00209

Closed Repeats

Abstract

Much research in stringology focuses on structures that can, in a way, ``grasp'' repeats (substrings that occur multiple times) as, for example, the so-called runs, a.k.a. maximal repetitions, compactly describe all tandem repeats. In this paper we introduce closed repeats: given a string $s$, its non-empty substring $s[i\,..\,j]$ is a right (left) closed repeat if its closest occurrence $s[i'\,..\,j']$ with $i' > i$ cannot be ``extended'' to the right (respectively, left) matching $s[j{+}1] = s[j'{+}1]$ (respectively, $s[i{-}1] = s[i'{-}1]$); the repeat is closed if it is both left and right closed. We note that the closed repeats correspond to the maximal closed substrings recently proposed by Badkobeh et al. and they include all runs as a special case. We prove that the number of right/left closed repeats is $O(n \log n)$, where $n$ is the length of $s$, and we show that this bound is tight. The (right/left) closed repeats can be computed in the optimal time $O(n\log n)$; as we prove, the computation time cannot be lower than $\Omega(n\log\sigma)$ over a general ordered alphabet of size $\sigma$ even when the number of the closed repeats is $O(n)$. As an application, we describe data structures using the closed repeats for a number of substring queries: finding the period of the substring provided it is ``periodic'', finding the longest repeat in the substring, computing the rightmost LZ77 parsing of the substring.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dmitry Kosolobov. 2024-09-30. Closed Repeats. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00209

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS