SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2410.04330

Sparse VARs Do Not Imply Sparse Local Projections: Robust Inference for High-Dimensional Granger Causality

Abstract

This paper studies multi-horizon Granger causality using high-dimensional local projections in sparse Vector Autoregressive (VAR) systems. Since local projection coefficients are nonlinear transformations of the underlying VAR parameters, existing approaches, such as de-biased least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and post-double-selection methods applied directly to local projections, lack a general justification, as sparsity of the VAR does not always propagate to higher horizons. We propose a two-step framework that avoids imposing sparsity at each horizon and delivers valid inference without relying on heteroskedasticityand autocorrelation-consistent (HAC) corrections. We establish large sample theory for the proposed estimators and develop feasible Wald tests. Monte Carlo experiments demonstrate improved size control across horizons relative to existing methods. An application to large financial systems illustrates horizon-specific connectedness.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Eugene Dettaa, Endong Wang. 2024-10-06. Sparse VARs Do Not Imply Sparse Local Projections: Robust Inference for High-Dimensional Granger Causality. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04330

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM