SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2410.07732

Partitioning Trillion Edge Graphs on Edge Devices

Abstract

Processing large-scale graphs, containing billions of entities, is critical across fields like bioinformatics, high-performance computing, navigation and route planning, among others. Efficient graph partitioning, which divides a graph into sub-graphs while minimizing inter-block edges, is essential to graph processing, as it optimizes parallel computing and enhances data locality. Traditional in-memory partitioners, such as METIS and KaHIP, offer high-quality partitions but are often infeasible for enormous graphs due to their substantial memory overhead. Streaming partitioners reduce memory usage to O(n), where 'n' is the number of nodes of the graph, by loading nodes sequentially and assigning them to blocks on-the-fly. This paper introduces StreamCPI, a novel framework that further reduces the memory overhead of streaming partitioners through run-length compression of block assignments. Notably, StreamCPI enables the partitioning of trillion-edge graphs on edge devices. Additionally, within this framework, we propose a modification to the LA-vector bit vector for append support, which can be used for online run-length compression in other streaming applications. Empirical results show that StreamCPI reduces memory usage while maintaining or improving partition quality. For instance, using StreamCPI, the Fennel partitioner effectively partitions a graph with 17 billion nodes and 1.03 trillion edges on a Raspberry Pi, achieving significantly better solution quality than Hashing, the only other feasible algorithm on edge devices. StreamCPI thus advances graph processing by enabling high-quality partitioning on low-cost machines.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Adil Chhabra, Florian Kurpicz, Christian Schulz, Dominik Schweisgut, Daniel Seemaier. 2024-10-10. Partitioning Trillion Edge Graphs on Edge Devices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07732

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS