Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2410.09825

Nickell Meets Stambaugh: A Tale of Two Biases in Panel Predictive Regressions

Chengwang Liao·Ziwei Mei·Zhentao Shi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In panel predictive regressions with persistent covariates, coexistence of the Nickell bias and the Stambaugh bias imposes challenges for estimation and hypothesis testing. This paper introduces an innovative estimator, the Double IVX (DIVX), inspired by the IVX technique in time series. DIVX effectively removes this composite Nickell-Stambaugh bias and reinstates standard inferential procedures based on the t-statistic. This new procedure achieves unified inference across a wide range of modes of persistence in panel predictive regressions when the cross-sectional dimension and the time dimension are comparably large. Such desirable properties were unattainable by existing methods, including the popular within-group estimator. Extensive Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate the robustness of DIVX under a variety of settings. We apply DIVX to panel data of financial markets in developed economies to examine the predictability of stock returns.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Chengwang Liao, Ziwei Mei, Zhentao Shi. 2024-10-13. Nickell Meets Stambaugh: A Tale of Two Biases in Panel Predictive Regressions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09825

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM↗