SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2410.13451

Parallel and Distributed Expander Decomposition: Simple, Fast, and Near-Optimal

Abstract

Expander decompositions have become one of the central frameworks in the design of fast algorithms. For an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$, a near-optimal $\phi$-expander decomposition is a partition $V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k$ of the vertex set $V$ where each subgraph $G[V_i]$ is a $\phi$-expander, and only an $\widetilde{O}(\phi)$-fraction of the edges cross between partition sets. In this article, we give the first near-optimal parallel algorithm to compute $\phi$-expander decompositions in near-linear work $\widetilde{O}(m/\phi^2)$ and near-constant span $\widetilde{O}(1/\phi^4)$. Our algorithm is very simple and likely practical. Our algorithm can also be implemented in the distributed Congest model in $\tilde{O}(1/\phi^4)$ rounds. Our results surpass the theoretical guarantees of the current state-of-the-art parallel algorithms [Chang-Saranurak PODC'19, Chang-Saranurak FOCS'20], while being the first to ensure that only an $\tilde{O}(\phi)$ fraction of edges cross between partition sets. In contrast, previous algorithms [Chang-Saranurak PODC'19, Chang-Saranurak FOCS'20] admit at least an $O(\phi^{1/3})$ fraction of crossing edges, a polynomial loss in quality inherent to their random-walk-based techniques. Our algorithm, instead, leverages flow-based techniques and extends the popular sequential algorithm presented in [Saranurak-Wang SODA'19].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Daoyuan Chen, Simon Meierhans, Maximilian Probst Gutenberg, Thatchaphol Saranurak. 2024-10-17. Parallel and Distributed Expander Decomposition: Simple, Fast, and Near-Optimal. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13451

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS