Streaming and Communication Complexity of Load-Balancing via Matching Contractors

Sepehr Assadi; Aaron Bernstein; Zachary Langley; Lap Chi Lau; Robert Wang

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2410.16094

Streaming and Communication Complexity of Load-Balancing via Matching Contractors

Sepehr Assadi·Aaron Bernstein·Zachary Langley·Lap Chi Lau·Robert Wang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the load-balancing problem, we have an $n$-vertex bipartite graph $G=(L, R, E)$ between a set of clients and servers. The goal is to find an assignment of all clients to the servers, while minimizing the maximum load on each server, where load of a server is the number of clients assigned to it. We study load-balancing in the one-way communication model: the edges of the input graph are partitioned between Alice and Bob, and Alice needs to send a message to Bob for him to output the solution. We show that settling the one-way communication complexity of load-balancing is equivalent to a natural sparsification problem for load-balancing. We then prove a dual interpretation of this sparsifier, showing that the minimum density of a sparsifier is effectively the same as the maximum density one can achieve for an extremal graph family that is new to this paper, called Matching-Contractors; these graphs are intimately connected to the well-known Ruzsa-Szemeredi graphs and generalize them in certain aspects. Our chain of equivalences thus shows that the one-way communication complexity of load-balancing can be reduced to a purely graph theoretic question: what is the maximum density of a Matching-Contractor on $n$ vertices? Finally, we present a novel combinatorial construction of some-what dense Matching-Contractors, which implies a strong one-way communication lower bound for load-balancing: any one-way protocol (even randomized) with $\tilde{O}(n)$ communication cannot achieve a better than $n^{\frac14-o(1)}$-approximation. Previously, no non-trivial lower bounds were known for protocols with even $O(n\log{n})$ bits of communication. Our result also implies the first non-trivial lower bounds for semi-streaming load-balancing in the edge-arrival model, ruling out $n^{\frac14-o(1)}$-approximation in a single-pass.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sepehr Assadi, Aaron Bernstein, Zachary Langley, Lap Chi Lau, Robert Wang. 2024-10-21. Streaming and Communication Complexity of Load-Balancing via Matching Contractors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16094

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗