SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2410.16529

Distributed Online Life-Long Learning (DOL3) for Multi-agent Trust and Reputation Assessment in E-commerce

Abstract

Trust and Reputation Assessment of service providers in citizen-focused environments like e-commerce is vital to maintain the integrity of the interactions among agents. The goals and objectives of both the service provider and service consumer agents are relevant to the goals of the respective citizens (end users). The provider agents often pursue selfish goals that can make the service quality highly volatile, contributing towards the non-stationary nature of the environment. The number of active service providers tends to change over time resulting in an open environment. This necessitates a rapid and continual assessment of the Trust and Reputation. A large number of service providers in the environment require a distributed multi-agent Trust and Reputation assessment. This paper addresses the problem of multi-agent Trust and Reputation Assessment in a non-stationary environment involving transactions between providers and consumers. In this setting, the observer agents carry out the assessment and communicate their assessed trust scores with each other over a network. We propose a novel Distributed Online Life-Long Learning (DOL3) algorithm that involves real-time rapid learning of trust and reputation scores of providers. Each observer carries out an adaptive learning and weighted fusion process combining their own assessment along with that of their neighbour in the communication network. Simulation studies reveal that the state-of-the-art methods, which usually involve training a model to assess an agent's trust and reputation, do not work well in such an environment. The simulation results show that the proposed DOL3 algorithm outperforms these methods and effectively handles the volatility in such environments. From the statistical evaluation, it is evident that DOL3 performs better compared to other models in 90% of the cases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hariprasauth Ramamoorthy, Shubhankar Gupta, Suresh Sundaram. 2024-10-21. Distributed Online Life-Long Learning (DOL3) for Multi-agent Trust and Reputation Assessment in E-commerce. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25719180.v1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI