Near-Optimal Deterministic Network Decomposition and Ruling Set, and Improved MIS

Mohsen Ghaffari; Christoph Grunau

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2410.19516

Near-Optimal Deterministic Network Decomposition and Ruling Set, and Improved MIS

Mohsen Ghaffari·Christoph Grunau

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper improves and in two cases nearly settles, up to logarithmically lower-order factors, the deterministic complexity of some of the most central problems in distributed graph algorithms, which have been studied for over three decades: Near-Optimal Network Decomposition: We present a deterministic distributed algorithm that computes a network decomposition in approximately O(log^2 n) rounds, with O(log n) diameter and O(log n) colors. This round complexity is near-optimal in the following sense: even given an ideal network decomposition, using it (in the standard way) requires round complexity equal to the product of diameter and number of colors, which is known to be approximately Omega(log^2 n). This near-optimality is remarkable, considering the rarity of optimal deterministic distributed algorithms and that for network decomposition, the first polylogarithmic-round algorithm was achieved only recently, by Rozhon and Ghaffari [STOC 2020], after three decades. Near-Optimal Ruling Set: We present a deterministic distributed algorithm that computes an O(log log n) ruling set in approximately O(log n) rounds. This is an exponential improvement over the O(log n) ruling set of Awerbuch, Goldberg, Luby, and Plotkin [FOCS 1989], while almost matching their O(log n) round complexity. Our result's round complexity nearly matches the approximately Omega(log n) lower bound established by Balliu, Brandt, Kuhn, and Olivetti [STOC 2022], which applies to any poly(log log n) ruling set. Improved Maximal Independent Set (MIS): We present a deterministic distributed algorithm for computing an MIS in approximately O(log^(5/3) n) rounds. This improves upon the approximately O(log^2 n) complexity achieved by Ghaffari and Grunau [STOC 2023] and breaks the log-squared barrier necessary for any method based on network decomposition.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Mohsen Ghaffari, Christoph Grunau. 2024-10-25. Near-Optimal Deterministic Network Decomposition and Ruling Set, and Improved MIS. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19516

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗