SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2410.21050

Matrix-by-matrix multiplication algorithm with $O(N^2log_2N)$ computational complexity for variable precision arithmetic

Abstract

We show that assuming the availability of the processor with variable precision arithmetic, we can compute matrix-by-matrix multiplications in $O(N^2log_2N)$ computational complexity. We replace the standard matrix-by-matrix multiplications $\begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} \\ A_{21} & A_{22}\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} B_{11} & B_{12} \\ B_{21} & B_{22}\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix} A_{11}B_{11}+A_{12}B_{21} & A_{11}B_{12}+A_{12}B_{22} \\ A_{21}B_{11}+A_{22}B_{21} & A_{21}B_{12}+A_{22}B_{22}\end{bmatrix}$ by $\begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} \\ A_{21} & A_{22}\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} B_{11} & B_{12} \\ B_{21} & B_{22}\end{bmatrix}=\Bigl\lfloor\begin{bmatrix} (A_{11}+\epsilon A_{12})(B_{11}+1/{\epsilon}B_{21}) & (A_{11}+\epsilon A_{12})(B_{12}+1/{\epsilon}B_{22}) \\ (A_{21}+\epsilon A_{22})(B_{11}+1/{\epsilon}B_{21}) &(A_{21}+\epsilon A_{22})(B_{12}+1/{\epsilon}B_{22})\end{bmatrix} \Bigr\rfloor \% \frac{1}{\epsilon}$ where $\lfloor \rfloor$ denotes the floor, and $\%$ denotes the modulo operators. We reduce the number of block matrix-by-matrix multiplications from 8 to 4, keeping the number of additions equal to 4, and additionally introducing 4 multiplications of a block matrices by $\epsilon$ or $\frac{1}{\epsilon}$, and 4 floor and 4 modulo operations. The resulting computational complexity for two matrices of size $N\times N$ can be estimated from recursive equation $T(N)=4(N/2)^2$ (multiplication of a matrix by $\epsilon$ and $1/\epsilon$) plus $4(N/2)^2$ (additions of two matrices) plus $2N^2$ (floor and modulo) plus $4T(N/2)$ (four recursive calls) as $O(N^2log_2N)$. These multiplications of blocks of a matrix by number scales like $O((N/2)^2)$. We also present a MATLAB code using \emph{vpa} variable precision arithmetic emulator that can multiply matrices of size $N\times N$ using $(4log_2N+1)N^2$ vpa operations. This emulator uses $O(N)$ digits to run our algorithm.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maciej Paszyński. 2024-10-28. Matrix-by-matrix multiplication algorithm with $O(N^2log_2N)$ computational complexity for variable precision arithmetic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21050

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS