SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2410.21469

Hybrid Bayesian Smoothing on Surfaces

Abstract

Modeling spatial processes that exhibit both smooth and rough features poses a significant challenge. This is especially true in fields where complex physical variables are observed across spatial domains. Traditional spatial techniques, such as Gaussian processes (GPs), are ill-suited to capture sharp transitions and discontinuities in spatial fields. In this paper, we propose a new approach incorporating non-Gaussian processes (NGPs) into a hybrid model which identifies both smooth and rough components. Specifically, we model the rough process using scaled mixtures of Gaussian distributions in a Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM). Our motivation comes from the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble (CESM-LE), where we seek to emulate climate sensitivity fields that exhibit complex spatial patterns, including abrupt transitions at ocean-land boundaries. We demonstrate that traditional GP models fail to capture such abrupt changes and that our proposed hybrid model, implemented through a full Gibbs sampler. This significantly improves model interpretability and accurate recovery of process parameters. Through a multi-factor simulation study, we evaluate the performance of several scaled mixtures designed to model the rough process. The results highlight the advantages of using these heavier tailed priors as a replacement to the Bayesian fused LASSO. One prior in particular, the normal Jeffrey's prior stands above the rest. We apply our model to the CESM-LE dataset, demonstrating its ability to better represent the mean function and its uncertainty in climate sensitivity fields. This work combines the strengths of GPs for smooth processes with the flexibility of NGPs for abrupt changes. We provide a computationally efficient Gibbs sampler and include additional strategies for accelerating Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) sampling.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Matthew Hofkes, Douglas Nychka. 2024-10-28. Hybrid Bayesian Smoothing on Surfaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21469

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME