Faster Algorithms for Average-Case Orthogonal Vectors and Closest Pair Problems

Josh Alman; Alexandr Andoni; Hengjie Zhang

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2410.22477

Faster Algorithms for Average-Case Orthogonal Vectors and Closest Pair Problems

Josh Alman·Alexandr Andoni·Hengjie Zhang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the average-case version of the Orthogonal Vectors problem, in which one is given as input $n$ vectors from $\{0,1\}^d$ which are chosen randomly so that each coordinate is $1$ independently with probability $p$. Kane and Williams [ITCS 2019] showed how to solve this problem in time $O(n^{2 - \delta_p})$ for a constant $\delta_p > 0$ that depends only on $p$. However, it was previously unclear how to solve the problem faster in the hardest parameter regime where $p$ may depend on $d$. The best prior algorithm was the best worst-case algorithm by Abboud, Williams and Yu [SODA 2014], which in dimension $d = c \cdot \log n$, solves the problem in time $n^{2 - \Omega(1/\log c)}$. In this paper, we give a new algorithm which improves this to $n^{2 - \Omega(\log\log c /\log c)}$ in the average case for any parameter $p$. As in the prior work, our algorithm uses the polynomial method. We make use of a very simple polynomial over the reals, and use a new method to analyze its performance based on computing how its value degrades as the input vectors get farther from orthogonal. To demonstrate the generality of our approach, we also solve the average-case version of the closest pair problem in the same running time.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Josh Alman, Alexandr Andoni, Hengjie Zhang. 2024-10-29. Faster Algorithms for Average-Case Orthogonal Vectors and Closest Pair Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22477

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗