Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2411.00519

Outlier-Oriented Poisoning Attack: A Grey-box Approach to Disturb Decision Boundaries by Perturbing Outliers in Multiclass Learning

Anum Paracha·Junaid Arshad·Mohamed Ben Farah·Khalid Ismail
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Poisoning attacks are a primary threat to machine learning models, aiming to compromise their performance and reliability by manipulating training datasets. This paper introduces a novel attack - Outlier-Oriented Poisoning (OOP) attack, which manipulates labels of most distanced samples from the decision boundaries. The paper also investigates the adverse impact of such attacks on different machine learning algorithms within a multiclass classification scenario, analyzing their variance and correlation between different poisoning levels and performance degradation. To ascertain the severity of the OOP attack for different degrees (5% - 25%) of poisoning, we analyzed variance, accuracy, precision, recall, f1-score, and false positive rate for chosen ML models.Benchmarking our OOP attack, we have analyzed key characteristics of multiclass machine learning algorithms and their sensitivity to poisoning attacks. Our experimentation used three publicly available datasets: IRIS, MNIST, and ISIC. Our analysis shows that KNN and GNB are the most affected algorithms with a decrease in accuracy of 22.81% and 56.07% while increasing false positive rate to 17.14% and 40.45% for IRIS dataset with 15% poisoning. Further, Decision Trees and Random Forest are the most resilient algorithms with the least accuracy disruption of 12.28% and 17.52% with 15% poisoning of the IRIS dataset. We have also analyzed the correlation between number of dataset classes and the performance degradation of models. Our analysis highlighted that number of classes are inversely proportional to the performance degradation, specifically the decrease in accuracy of the models, which is normalized with increasing number of classes. Further, our analysis identified that imbalanced dataset distribution can aggravate the impact of poisoning for machine learning models

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Anum Paracha, Junaid Arshad, Mohamed Ben Farah, Khalid Ismail. 2024-11-01. Outlier-Oriented Poisoning Attack: A Grey-box Approach to Disturb Decision Boundaries by Perturbing Outliers in Multiclass Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00519

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗