SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2411.04418

Fully Dynamic (\Delta+1) Coloring Against Adaptive Adversaries

Abstract

Over the years, there has been extensive work on fully dynamic algorithms for classic graph problems that admit greedy solutions. Examples include $(\Delta+1)$ vertex coloring, maximal independent set, and maximal matching. For all three problems, there are randomized algorithms that maintain a valid solution after each edge insertion or deletion to the $n$-vertex graph by spending $\polylog n$ time, provided that the adversary is oblivious. However, none of these algorithms work against adaptive adversaries whose updates may depend on the output of the algorithm. In fact, even breaking the trivial bound of $O(n)$ against adaptive adversaries remains open for all three problems. For instance, in the case of $(\Delta+1)$ vertex coloring, the main challenge is that an adaptive adversary can keep inserting edges between vertices of the same color, necessitating a recoloring of one of the endpoints. The trivial algorithm would simply scan all neighbors of one endpoint to find a new available color (which always exists) in $O(n)$ time. In this paper, we break this linear barrier for the $(\Delta+1)$ vertex coloring problem. Our algorithm is randomized, and maintains a valid $(\Delta+1)$ vertex coloring after each edge update by spending $\widetilde{O}(n^{8/9})$ time with high probability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Soheil Behnezhad, Rajmohan Rajaraman, Omer Wasim. 2024-11-07. Fully Dynamic (\Delta+1) Coloring Against Adaptive Adversaries. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04418

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS