Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2411.06772

A Text Classification Model Combining Adversarial Training with Pre-trained Language Model and neural networks: A Case Study on Telecom Fraud Incident Texts

Liu Zhuoxian·Shi Tuo·Hu Xiaofeng
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Front-line police officers often categorize all police call reported cases of Telecom Fraud into 14 subcategories to facilitate targeted prevention measures, such as precise public education. However, the associated data is characterized by its large volume, diverse information content, and variations in expression. Currently, there is a lack of efficient and accurate intelligent models to replace manual classification, which, while precise, is relatively inefficient. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a text classification model that combines adversarial training with Pre-trained Language Model and neural networks. The Linguistically-motivated Pre-trained Language Model model extracts three types of language features and then utilizes the Fast Gradient Method algorithm to perturb the generated embedding layer. Subsequently, the Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory and Convolutional Neural Networks networks extract contextual syntactic information and local semantic information, respectively. The model achieved an 83.9% classification accuracy when trained on a portion of telecom fraud case data provided by the operational department. The model established in this paper has been deployed in the operational department, freeing up a significant amount of manpower and improving the department's efficiency in combating Telecom Fraud crimes. Furthermore, considering the universality of the model established in this paper, other application scenarios await further exploration.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Liu Zhuoxian, Shi Tuo, Hu Xiaofeng. 2024-11-11. A Text Classification Model Combining Adversarial Training with Pre-trained Language Model and neural networks: A Case Study on Telecom Fraud Incident Texts. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06772

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗