SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2411.08151

New Separations and Reductions for Directed Preservers and Hopsets

Abstract

We study distance preservers, hopsets, and shortcut sets in $n$-node, $m$-edge directed graphs, and show improved bounds and new reductions for various settings of these problems. Our first set of results is about exact and approximate distance preservers. We give the following bounds on the size of directed distance preservers with $p$ demand pairs: 1) $\tilde{O}(n^{5/6}p^{2/3} + n)$ edges for exact distance preservers in unweighted graphs; and 2) $\Omega(n^{2/3}p^{2/3})$ edges for approximate distance preservers with any given finite stretch, in graphs with arbitrary aspect ratio. Additionally, we establish a new directed-to-undirected reduction for exact distance preservers. We show that if undirected distance preservers have size $O(n^{\lambda}p^{\mu} + n)$ for constants $\lambda, \mu > 0$, then directed distance preservers have size $O\left( n^{\frac{1}{2-\lambda}}p^{\frac{1+\mu-\lambda}{2-\lambda}} + n^{1/2}p + n\right).$ As a consequence of the reduction, if current upper bounds for undirected preservers can be improved for some $p \leq n$, then so can current upper bounds for directed preservers. Our second set of results is about directed hopsets and shortcut sets. For hopsets in directed graphs, we prove that the hopbound is: 1) $\Omega(n^{2/9})$ for $O(m)$-size shortcut sets, improving the previous $\Omega(n^{1/5})$ bound [Vassilevska Williams, Xu and Xu, SODA 2024]; 2) $\Omega(n^{2/7})$ for $O(m)$-size exact hopsets in unweighted graphs, improving the previous $\Omega(n^{1/4})$ bound [Bodwin and Hoppenworth, FOCS 2023]; and 3) $\Omega(n^{1/2})$ for $O(n)$-size approximate hopsets with any given finite stretch, in graphs with arbitrary aspect ratio. This result establishes a separation between this setting and $O(n)$-size approximate hopsets for graphs with polynomial aspect ratio, which have hopbound $\widetilde{O}(n^{1/3})$ [Bernstein and Wein, SODA 2023].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gary Hoppenworth, Yinzhan Xu, Zixuan Xu. 2024-11-12. New Separations and Reductions for Directed Preservers and Hopsets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08151

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS