Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2411.09026

On the Complexity of Hazard-Free Formulas

Leah London Arazi·Amir Shpilka
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper studies the hazard-free formula complexity of Boolean functions. Our first result shows that unate functions are the only Boolean functions for which the monotone formula complexity of the hazard-derivative equals the hazard-free formula complexity of the function itself. Consequently, they are the only functions for which the hazard-derivative approach of Ikenmeyer et al. (J. ACM, 2019) yields optimal bounds. Our second result proves that the hazard-free formula complexity of random Boolean functions is at most $2^{(1+o(1))n}$. Prior to this, no better upper bound than $O(3^n)$ was known. Notably, unlike in the general case of Boolean circuits and formulas, where the typical complexity is derived from that of the multiplexer function with $n$-bit selector, the hazard-free formula complexity of a random function is smaller than the optimal hazard-free formula for the multiplexer by an exponential factor in $n$. We provide two proofs of this fact. The first is direct, bounding the number of prime implicants of a random Boolean function and using this bound to construct a DNF of the claimed size. The second introduces a new and independently interesting result: a weak converse to the hazard-derivative lower bound method, which gives an upper bound on the hazard-free complexity of a function in terms of the monotone complexity of a subset of its hazard-derivatives. Additionally, we explore the hazard-free formula complexity of block composition of Boolean functions and obtain a result in the hazard-free setting that is analogous to a result of Karchmer, Raz, and Wigderson (Computational Complexity, 1995) in the monotone setting. We show that our result implies a stronger lower bound on the hazard-free formula depth of the block composition of the set covering function with the multiplexer function than the bound obtained via the hazard-derivative method.

Explore related subjects

cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Leah London Arazi, Amir Shpilka. 2024-11-13. On the Complexity of Hazard-Free Formulas. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09026

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC↗