SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2411.09114

Comparative genomics with succinct colored de Bruijn graphs

Abstract

DNA technologies have evolved significantly in the past years enabling the sequencing of a large number of genomes in a short time. Nevertheless, the underlying computational problem is hard, and many technical factors and limitations complicate obtaining the complete sequence of a genome. Many genomes are left in a draft state, in which each chromosome is represented by a set of sequences with partial information on their relative order. Recently, some approaches have been proposed to compare draft genomes by comparing paths in de Bruijn graphs, which are constructed by many practical genome assemblers. In this article we introduce gcBB, a method for comparing genomes represented as succinct colored de Bruijn graphs directly, without resorting to sequence alignments, by means of the entropy and expectation measures based on the Burrows-Wheeler Similarity Distribution. We also introduce an improved version of gcBB, called mgcBB, that improves the time performance considerably through the selection of different data structures. We have compared phylogenies of genomes obtained by other methods to those obtained with gcBB, achieving promising results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lucas P. Ramos, Felipe A. Louza, Guilherme P. Telles. 2024-11-14. Comparative genomics with succinct colored de Bruijn graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09114

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS