Optimal Fixed-Price Mechanism with Signaling

Zhikang Fan; Weiran Shen

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2411.10791

Optimal Fixed-Price Mechanism with Signaling

Zhikang Fan·Weiran Shen

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Consider a trade market with one seller and multiple buyers. The seller aims to sell an indivisible item and maximize their revenue. This paper focuses on a simple and popular mechanism--the fixed-price mechanism. Unlike the standard setting, we assume there is information asymmetry between buyers and the seller. Specifically, we allow the seller to design information before setting the fixed price, which implies that we study the mechanism design problem in a broader space. We call this mechanism space the fixed-price signaling mechanism. We assume that buyers' valuation of the item depends on the quality of the item. The seller can privately observe the item's quality, whereas buyers only see its distribution. In this case, the seller can influence buyers' valuations by strategically disclosing information about the item's quality, thereby adjusting the fixed price. We consider two types of buyers with different levels of rationality: ex-post individual rational (IR) and ex-interim individual rational. We show that when the market has only one buyer, the optimal revenue generated by the fixed-price signaling mechanism is identical to that of the fixed-price mechanism, regardless of the level of rationality. Furthermore, when there are multiple buyers in the market and all of them are ex-post IR, we show that there is no fixed-price mechanism that is obedient for all buyers. However, if all buyers are ex-interim IR, we show that the optimal fixed-price signaling mechanism will generate more revenue for the seller than the fixed-price mechanism.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Zhikang Fan, Weiran Shen. 2024-11-16. Optimal Fixed-Price Mechanism with Signaling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10791

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗