SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2411.10858

Scalable Gaussian Process Regression Via Median Posterior Inference for Estimating Multi-Pollutant Mixture Health Effects

Abstract

Humans are exposed to complex mixtures of environmental pollutants rather than single chemicals, necessitating methods to quantify the health effects of such mixtures. Research on environmental mixtures provides insights into realistic exposure scenarios, informing regulatory policies that better protect public health. However, statistical challenges, including complex correlations among pollutants and nonlinear multivariate exposure-response relationships, complicate such analyses. A popular Bayesian semi-parametric Gaussian process regression framework (Coull et al., 2015) addresses these challenges by modeling exposure-response functions with Gaussian processes and performing feature selection to manage high-dimensional exposures while accounting for confounders. Originally designed for small to moderate-sized cohort studies, this framework does not scale well to massive datasets. To address this, we propose a divide-and-conquer strategy, partitioning data, computing posterior distributions in parallel, and combining results using the generalized median. While we focus on Gaussian process models for environmental mixtures, the proposed distributed computing strategy is broadly applicable to other Bayesian models with computationally prohibitive full-sample Markov Chain Monte Carlo fitting. We provide theoretical guarantees for the convergence of the proposed posterior distributions to those derived from the full sample. We apply this method to estimate associations between a mixture of ambient air pollutants and ~650,000 birthweights recorded in Massachusetts during 2001-2012. Our results reveal negative associations between birthweight and traffic pollution markers, including elemental and organic carbon and PM2.5, and positive associations with ozone and vegetation greenness.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aaron Sonabend, Jiangshan Zhang, Edgar Castro, Joel Schwartz, Brent A. Coull, Junwei Lu. 2024-11-16. Scalable Gaussian Process Regression Via Median Posterior Inference for Estimating Multi-Pollutant Mixture Health Effects. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc%2Fujag071

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME