Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2411.11051

Amortized Analysis of Leftist Heaps

Berry Schoenmakers
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Leftist heaps and skew heaps are two well-known data structures for mergeable priority queues. Leftist heaps are constructed for efficiency in the worst-case sense whereas skew heaps are self-adjusting, designed for efficiency in the amortized sense. In this paper, we analyze the amortized complexity of leftist heaps to initiate a full performance comparison with skew heaps. We consider both the leftist heaps originally developed by Crane and Knuth, which are also referred to as rank-biased (or, height-biased) leftist heaps, and the weight-biased leftist heaps introduced by Cho and Sahni. We show how weight-biased leftist heaps satisfy the same exact amortized bounds as skew heaps. With these matching bounds we establish a nice trade-off in which storage of weights is used to limit the worst-case complexity of leftist heaps, without affecting the amortized complexity compared to skew heaps. For rank-biased leftist heaps, we obtain the same amortized lower bounds as for skew heaps, but whether these bounds are tight is left as an open problem.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Berry Schoenmakers. 2024-11-17. Amortized Analysis of Leftist Heaps. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75783-9_3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗