Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2411.14006

Experimental comparison of graph-based approximate nearest neighbor search algorithms on edge devices

Ali Ganbarov·Jicheng Yuan·Anh Le-Tuan·Manfred Hauswirth·Danh Le-Phuoc
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we present an experimental comparison of various graph-based approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search algorithms deployed on edge devices for real-time nearest neighbor search applications, such as smart city infrastructure and autonomous vehicles. To the best of our knowledge, this specific comparative analysis has not been previously conducted. While existing research has explored graph-based ANN algorithms, it has often been limited to single-threaded implementations on standard commodity hardware. Our study leverages the full computational and storage capabilities of edge devices, incorporating additional metrics such as insertion and deletion latency of new vectors and power consumption. This comprehensive evaluation aims to provide valuable insights into the performance and suitability of these algorithms for edge-based real-time tracking systems enhanced by nearest-neighbor search algorithms.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.ARcs.CVcs.DCcs.PF

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ali Ganbarov, Jicheng Yuan, Anh Le-Tuan, Manfred Hauswirth, Danh Le-Phuoc. 2024-11-21. Experimental comparison of graph-based approximate nearest neighbor search algorithms on edge devices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗