Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2411.14994

Approximating Prize-Collecting Variants of TSP

Morteza Alimi·Tobias Mömke·Michael Ruderer
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present an approximation algorithm for the Prize-collecting Ordered Traveling Salesman Problem (PCOTSP), which simultaneously generalizes the Prize-collecting TSP and the Ordered TSP. The Prize-collecting TSP is well-studied and has a long history, with the current best approximation factor slightly below $1.6$, shown by Blauth, Klein and N\"agele [IPCO 2024]. The best approximation ratio for Ordered TSP is $\frac{3}{2}+\frac{1}{e}$, presented by B\"{o}hm, Friggstad, M\"{o}mke, Spoerhase [SODA 2025] and Armbruster, Mnich, N\"{a}gele [Approx 2024]. The former also present a factor 2.2131 approximation algorithm for Multi-Path-TSP. By carefully tuning the techniques of the latest results on the aforementioned problems and leveraging the unique properties of our problem, we present a 2.097-approximation algorithm for PCOTSP. A key idea in our result is to first sample a set of trees, and then probabilistically pick up some vertices, while using the pruning ideas of Blauth, Klein, N\"{a}gele [IPCO 2024] on other vertices to get cheaper parity correction; the sampling probability and the penalty paid by the LP playing a crucial part in both cases. A straightforward adaptation of the aforementioned pruning ideas would only give minuscule improvements over standard parity correction methods. Instead, we use the specific characteristics of our problem together with properties gained from running a simple combinatorial algorithm to bring the approximation factor below 2.1. Our techniques extend to Prize-collecting Multi-Path TSP, building on results from B\"{o}hm, Friggstad, M\"{o}mke, Spoerhase [SODA 2025], leading to a 2.41-approximation.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Morteza Alimi, Tobias Mömke, Michael Ruderer. 2024-11-22. Approximating Prize-Collecting Variants of TSP. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14994

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗