SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2411.16139

Beyond Task Vectors: Selective Task Arithmetic Based on Importance Metrics

Abstract

Pretrained models have revolutionized deep learning by enabling significant performance improvements across a wide range of tasks, leveraging large-scale, pre-learned knowledge representations. However, deploying these models in real-world multi-task learning (MTL) scenarios poses substantial challenges, primarily due to high computational costs and inefficiencies in inference. Traditional approaches such as pruning, quantization, and knowledge distillation have been explored to mitigate these issues, but they often fall short in fully addressing the complexities of multi-task environments. This paper introduces \textbf{\underline{S}}elective \textbf{\underline{T}}ask \textbf{\underline{A}}rithmetic \underline{\textbf{(STA)}}, a training-free framework designed to enhance multi-task performance through task-specific parameter fusion. STA addresses three key challenges: (i) \textbf{Parameter importance diversity: } Recognizing that different tasks relie on distinct parameters, STA employs a loss-sensitive parameter importance metric derived from a first-order Taylor expansion to accurately measure the importance of parameters for each task. (ii) \textbf{Over-reliance on hyperparameter tuning: }By enhancing the sparsity of task vectors through parameter importance metrics, STA reduces the need for extensive hyperparameter tuning, thereby improving the generalization and robustness of the model. (iii) \textbf{Neglect of other abilities in task arithmetic: } Previous works have largely overlooked the potential for more precise task forgetting. STA leverages its parameter importance metric to achieve more controlled and effective task forgetting, minimizing the impact of noisy elements that can degrade model performance. Experimental results demonstrate that STA achieves superior multi-task performance across benchmarks and excellent performance in task forgetting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tian Bowen, Lai Songning, Wu Jiemin, Shuai Zhihao, Ge Shiming, Yue Yutao. 2024-11-25. Beyond Task Vectors: Selective Task Arithmetic Based on Importance Metrics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16139

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG