SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2411.17307

An Astronomical Interpretation of the Nebra Sky Disc

Abstract

We agree with the interpretation of W. Schlosser, that the Nebra Sky Disc is a reminder of a method of determining a start date (and possibly also an end date) of the farming year. We extend this interpretation. We think that we found the constellation Taurus on the Disc, which forms by addition of three stars from the constellation Gemini the pattern of a plough of Bronze Age. Moreover we found a line on the disc consisting of the stars epsilon Gem, theta Aur, beta Aur and alpha Aur, which we called the Auriga line. We think that the Nebra people used the Auriga line to determine the day (which we call beta day) on which the Pleiades are vertically below beta Aur at dusk in February. We found a second representation of the Auriga line on the Disc where the distance ratios between the stars are very precisely equal to the distance ratios in the sky, and where the Pleiades are vertically below beta Aur. This proves that the Nebra people must have measured the distances, and that our hypothesis is correct. The beta day could have been used to harmonize a lunisolar calendar with the solar year. However, the most likely possibility seems to us that a good sowing date could be determined by setting the sowing on the second round lunar phase after the beta day. (By round lunar phases we mean the full moon and the new moon.) Such a sowing date makes it possible to start a week count based on the lunar phases with the sowing in order to determine other agricultural dates. The astronomical knowledge for this procedure can be gained by astronomical observations only. No mathematical calculations and import of knowledge from a Mediterranean culture are necessary.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bernd Fiedler. 2024-11-26. An Astronomical Interpretation of the Nebra Sky Disc. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17307

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Scientific Promise

Scientists constantly face decisions about what lines of research to pursue. This Element introduces the philosophical debate about scientific pursuitworthiness. It explains how it can be rational to pursue a theory even if the theory is less well supported than its rivals, and it discusses existing philosophical frameworks for guiding pursuit decisions. The Element also develops a new perspective. Existing accounts focus predominantly on theories, while experiments are largely neglected. This is an important shortcoming. Theoretical promise depends on experimental promise, and experimental promise raises questions of its own. Drawing on the epistemology of experimentation, the Element advances an account of experimental pursuitworthiness. It is argued that such pursuitworthiness depends on experimental virtues like a clear signal and simplicity of design. Moreover, the kinds of uncertainty that constrain the assessment of scientific pursuits are examined. Finally, the Element highlights open questions in the philosophy of scientific pursuitworthiness.

physics.hist-ph

Is Black Hole Evaporation Prediction Friendly?

Manchak and Weatherall (2018) formulate the black hole information paradox as a failure of predictability in black hole evaporation spacetimes, diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I offer a strategy for resolving this paradox. I argue that failures of predictability in black hole evaporation are not well diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I then consider two weakenings of global hyperbolicity: prediction and retrodiction friendliness, the failure of which could ground a new paradox. However, deidealized black hole evaporation models can be prediction and retrodiction friendly. Therefore, the information paradox cannot be based upon failures of global hyperbolicity, nor either retrodiction or prediction unfriendliness.

physics.hist-ph

The Crab Nebula progenitor: recovering the 1054 AD supernova event as galactic Gamma-ray burst

In 1054 AD a daytime star appeared in the constellation of Taurus, for three weeks, and it was reported in various sources from Europe to China/Japan: it was one of the few documented galactic supernovae of the last two millenia. This paradigm has been established about sixty years ago, as the comprehension of the physics of supernovae progressed with enough observational data. The Gamma-ray bursts were discovered in the same period, but only in the past few years have their observations become daily and their distances have been fully understood as cosmological. After the explosion, the exponential decay of the luminosity in gamma-rays and X-rays has been followed with telescopes onboard dedicated satellites. Also the exponential decay of the afterglow's optical and radio frequencies have been observed with the largest optical and radio telescopes. Within the binary-driven hypernova framework, successful in explaining all the observed phases of the Gamma-ray bursts, the universal exponential decay can be extended to 1000 years after the burst, to account for the present values of Gamma and X-rays as well as optical and radio frequencies of the Crab Nebula. Both the daytime visibility of the burst, and the simultaneous radiation plagues appeared in Constantinople and Cairo is a strong evidence of the presence of Gamma-rays in the lower atmosphere, coming from the same source originating the Crab nebula. The association to the daytime visibility of that star and the following plague meets exactly the etymology of the word dis-aster, bad star.

physics.hist-ph