Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2411.18028

Improved parallel derandomization via finite automata with applications

Jeff Giliberti·David G. Harris
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A central approach to algorithmic derandomization is to construct probability distributions with small support that "fool" randomized algorithms, often enabling efficient parallel (NC) implementations. An abstraction of this idea is fooling polynomial-space statistical tests computed via finite automata (Sivakumar 2002); this encompasses a wide range of properties including $k$-wise independence and sums of random variables. We present new parallel algorithms to fool automata, with significantly reduced processor complexity. Briefly, our approach is to iteratively sparsify distributions via work-efficient lattice discrepancy rounding, while tracking an aggregate weighted error that is determined by the Lipschitz value of the statistical tests. We illustrate with applications to the Gale-Berlekamp Switching Game and approximate MAX-CUT via SDP rounding. These involve several optimizations, including truncating the state space of the automata and using FFT-based convolutions to compute transition probabilities efficiently.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jeff Giliberti, David G. Harris. 2024-11-27. Improved parallel derandomization via finite automata with applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18028

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗