Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2412.05744

PICS: A sequential approach to obtain optimal designs for non-linear models leveraging closed-form solutions for faster convergence

Suvrojit Ghosh·Koulik Khamaru·Tirthankar Dasgupta
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

D-Optimal designs for estimating parameters of response models are derived by maximizing the determinant of the Fisher information matrix. For non-linear models, the Fisher information matrix depends on the unknown parameter vector of interest, leading to a weird situation that in order to obtain the D-optimal design, one needs to have knowledge of the parameter to be estimated. One solution to this problem is to choose the design points sequentially, optimizing the D-optimality criterion using parameter estimates based on available data, followed by updating the parameter estimates using maximum likelihood estimation. On the other hand, there are many non-linear models for which closed-form results for D-optimal designs are available, but because such solutions involve the parameters to be estimated, they can only be used by substituting "guestimates" of parameters. In this paper, a hybrid sequential strategy called PICS (Plug into closed-form solution) is proposed that replaces the optimization of the objective function at every single step by a draw from the probability distribution induced by the known optimal design by plugging in the current estimates. Under regularity conditions, asymptotic normality of the sequence of estimators generated by this approach are established. Usefulness of this approach in terms of saving computational time and achieving greater efficiency of estimation compared to the standard sequential approach are demonstrated with simulations conducted from two different sets of models.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Suvrojit Ghosh, Koulik Khamaru, Tirthankar Dasgupta. 2024-12-07. PICS: A sequential approach to obtain optimal designs for non-linear models leveraging closed-form solutions for faster convergence. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2025.2573234

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗