A Generalized Mixture Cure Model Incorporating Known Cured Individuals

Georgios Karakatsoulis

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2412.06027

A Generalized Mixture Cure Model Incorporating Known Cured Individuals

Georgios Karakatsoulis

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Mixture Cure (MC) models constitute an appropriate and easily interpretable method when studying a time-to-event variable in a population comprised of both susceptible and cured individuals. In literature, those models usually assume that the latter are unobservable. However, there are cases in which a cured individual may be identified. For example, when studying the distant metastasis during the lifetime or the miscarriage during pregnancy, individuals that have died without a metastasis or have given birth are certainly non-susceptible. The same also holds when studying the x-year overall survival or the death during hospital stay. Common MC models ignore this information and consider them all censored, thus yielding in risk of assigning low immune probabilities to cured individuals. In this study, we consider a MC model that incorporates known information on cured individuals, with the time to cure identification being either deterministic or stochastic. We use the expectation-maximization algorithm to derive the maximum likelihood estimators. Furthermore, we compare different strategies that account for cure information such as (1) assigning infinite times to event for known cured cases and adjusting the traditional model and (2) considering only the probability of cure identification but ignoring the time until that happens. Theoretical results and simulations demonstrate the value of the proposed model especially when the time to cure identification is stochastic, increasing precision and decreasing the mean squared error. On the other hand, the traditional models that ignore the known cured information perform well when the curation is achieved after a known cutoff point. Moreover, through simulations the comparisons of the different strategies are examined, as possible alternatives to the complete-information model.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Georgios Karakatsoulis. 2024-12-08. A Generalized Mixture Cure Model Incorporating Known Cured Individuals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06027

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗