SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2412.13813

Differentially Private Substring and Document Counting with Near-Optimal Error

Abstract

For databases consisting of many text documents, one of the most fundamental data analysis tasks is counting (i) how often a pattern appears as a substring in the database (substring counting) and (ii) how many documents in the collection contain the pattern as a substring (document counting). If such a database contains sensitive data, it is crucial to protect the privacy of individuals in the database. Differential privacy is the gold standard for privacy in data analysis. It gives rigorous privacy guarantees, but comes at the cost of yielding less accurate results. In this paper, we carry out a theoretical study of substring and document counting under differential privacy. We propose a data structure storing $\epsilon$-differentially private counts for all possible query patterns with a maximum additive error of $O(\ell\cdot\mathrm{polylog}(n\ell|\Sigma|))$, where $\ell$ is the maximum length of a document in the database, $n$ is the number of documents, and $|\Sigma|$ is the size of the alphabet. We also improve the error bound for document counting with $(\epsilon, \delta)$-differential privacy to $O(\sqrt{\ell}\cdot\mathrm{polylog}(n\ell|\Sigma|))$. We show that our additive errors for substring counting and document counting are optimal up to an $O(\mathrm{polylog}(n\ell))$ factor both for $\epsilon$-differential privacy and $(\epsilon, \delta)$-differential privacy. Our data structures immediately lead to improved algorithms for related problems, such as privately mining frequent substrings and q-grams. Additionally, we develop a new technique of independent interest for differentially privately computing a general class of counting functions on trees.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Giulia Bernardini, Philip Bille, Inge Li Gørtz, Teresa Anna Steiner. 2024-12-18. Differentially Private Substring and Document Counting with Near-Optimal Error. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13813

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS