SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2412.14441

Fine-Grained Computation in 3-Space: Matrix Multiplication and Graph Problems

Abstract

Obeying constraints imposed by classical physics, we give optimal fine-grained algorithms for matrix multiplication and problems involving graphs and mazes, where all calculations are done in 3-dimensional space. We assume that whatever the technology is, a bit requires a minimum volume and communication travels at a bounded speed. These imply that multiplying $n \times n$ matrices takes $\Omega(n^{2/3})$ time, and we show that this can be achieved by a fine-grained 3-d mesh of $n^2$ processors. While the constants are impractically large, this is asymptotically faster than parallel implementations of Strassen's algorithm, while the lower bound shows that some claims about parallelizing faster serial algorithms are impossible in 3-space. If the matrices are not over a ring then multiplication can be done in $\Theta(n^{3/4})$ time by expanding to a mesh larger than the input. In 2-d (such as the surface of a chip) this approach is useless and $\Theta(n)$ systolic algorithms are optimal even when the matrices are over a ring. Similarly, for path and maze problems there are approaches useful in 3-d but not 2-d.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Quentin F. Stout. 2024-12-19. Fine-Grained Computation in 3-Space: Matrix Multiplication and Graph Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14441

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS