SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2501.00634

Copula Central Asymmetry of Equity Portfolios

Abstract

Financial crises are usually associated with increased cross-sectional dependence between asset returns, causing asymmetry between the lower and upper tail of return distribution. The detection of asymmetric dependence is now understood to be essential for market supervision, risk management, and portfolio allocation. I propose a non-parametric test procedure for the hypothesis of copula central symmetry based on the Cram\'er-von Mises distance of the empirical copula and its survival counterpart, deriving the asymptotic properties of the test under standard assumptions for stationary time series. I use the powerful tie-break bootstrap that, as the included simulation study implies, allows me to detect asymmetries with up to 25 series and the number of observations corresponding to one year of daily returns. Applying the procedure to US portfolio returns separately for each year shows that the amount of copula central asymmetry is time-varying and less present in the recent past. Asymmetry is more critical in portfolios based on size and less in portfolios based on book-to-market and momentum. In portfolios based on industry classification, asymmetry is present during market downturns, coherently with the financial contagion narrative.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lorenzo Frattarolo. 2024-12-31. Copula Central Asymmetry of Equity Portfolios. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00634

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM