SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2501.05221

RUM-NN: A Neural Network Model Compatible with Random Utility Maximisation for Discrete Choice Setups

Abstract

This paper introduces a framework for capturing stochasticity of choice probabilities in neural networks, derived from and fully consistent with the Random Utility Maximization (RUM) theory, referred to as RUM-NN. Neural network models show remarkable performance compared with statistical models; however, they are often criticized for their lack of transparency and interoperability. The proposed RUM-NN is introduced in both linear and nonlinear structures. The linear RUM-NN retains the interpretability and identifiability of traditional econometric discrete choice models while using neural network-based estimation techniques. The nonlinear RUM-NN extends the model's flexibility and predictive capabilities to capture nonlinear relationships between variables within utility functions. Additionally, the RUM-NN allows for the implementation of various parametric distributions for unobserved error components in the utility function and captures correlations among error terms. The performance of RUM-NN in parameter recovery and prediction accuracy is rigorously evaluated using synthetic datasets through Monte Carlo experiments. Additionally, RUM-NN is evaluated on the Swissmetro and the London Passenger Mode Choice (LPMC) datasets with different sets of distribution assumptions for the error component. The results demonstrate that RUM-NN under a linear utility structure and IID Gumbel error terms can replicate the performance of the Multinomial Logit (MNL) model, but relaxing those constraints leads to superior performance for both Swissmetro and LPMC datasets. By introducing a novel estimation approach aligned with statistical theories, this study empowers econometricians to harness the advantages of neural network models.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Niousha Bagheri, Milad Ghasri, Michael Barlow. 2025-01-09. RUM-NN: A Neural Network Model Compatible with Random Utility Maximisation for Discrete Choice Setups. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05221

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM