Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2501.08708

The anthyphairetic reconstruction of the original Pythagorean proof of incommensurability, by means of the restoration of Book II of the Elements to its original Pythagorean form

Stelios Negrepontis·Vassiliki Farmaki
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Unquestionably the greatest discovery of the Pythagoreans is the existence of incommensurable magnitudes, most probably the incommensurability of the diameter to the side of a square, but there is no agreement among historians of Greek mathematics on their method of proof. In this chapter we present novel arguments not only for an anthyphairetic reconstruction of the original Pythagorean proof of incommensurability, but also in favor of one that employs the Pythagorean Application of Areas in Excess and in fact Geometric Algebra. The main tool for this reconstruction is the restoration of Book II of the Elements to its original Pythagorean form. The final version of this paper will appear as a chapter in the book Essays on Geometry: Celebrating the 65th Birthday of Athanase Papadopoulos, ed. A. Muhammed Uluda\u{g} and A. Zeytin, Springer International Publishing, 2025.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stelios Negrepontis, Vassiliki Farmaki. 2025-01-15. The anthyphairetic reconstruction of the original Pythagorean proof of incommensurability, by means of the restoration of Book II of the Elements to its original Pythagorean form. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08708

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗