Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2501.11794

SPID-Chain: Verifiable Polar-Coded State Validation for Cross-Chain DAG Settlement

Amirhossein Taherpour·Xiaodong Wang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Cross-chain settlement must preserve safety across heterogeneous ledgers while tolerating delayed computation, Byzantine participants, and adversarial transaction issuance. This paper presents SPID-Chain, an adapter-compatible settlement architecture for escrow-backed fungible transfers across programmable blockchains. SPID-Chain maintains settlement state through persistent Polar-coded fragments, validates candidate state transitions using hidden linear verification checks, and records certified transfers in a weighted directed acyclic graph (DAG). The design separates native-chain finality from cross-chain settlement: source-chain finality establishes an immutable reservation, whereas weighted DAG confirmation determines when the corresponding destination credit becomes executable. We derive an exact recovery-time distribution for heterogeneous coded workers, a verification-soundness bound for Byzantine responses, and an exact weighted-quorum condition for conflicting-block safety. These components are coupled in a cross-layer stability theorem showing how the coded-validation completion probability determines the effective honest issuance rate and, consequently, the stable adversarial-load region of the settlement DAG. We further establish an end-to-end settlement guarantee covering balance non-negativity, asset conservation, conflict exclusion, replay protection, coded-state consistency, and finite expected lock-to-release latency under the stated liveness conditions. Prototype-assisted simulations indicate that coded validation reduces sensitivity to stragglers, improves validation and confirmation throughput under heterogeneous delays, and produces the predicted transition between stable and unstable DAG operation. The resulting framework provides a verifiable and analytically grounded settlement layer without modifying the native consensus protocol of participating chains.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Amirhossein Taherpour, Xiaodong Wang. 2025-01-21. SPID-Chain: Verifiable Polar-Coded State Validation for Cross-Chain DAG Settlement. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11794

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online Treasure Hunt in Vertex-Permuted Dynamic Rings

We study the problem of treasure hunt by a group of $k \geq 1$ agents in vertex-permuted dynamic rings (VP). In this model, the $n$ vertices remain on a ring but are permuted at each time step. We first show that treasure hunt is impossible for any $k \leq n-3$ agents, if there are no restrictions on the sequence of permutations used in the dynamic ring. We then study the $VP(\delta)$ setting, in which for every pair $i, j$ of vertices, the edge $(i, j)$ is guaranteed to appear within $\delta$ steps. We show that the class $VP(\delta)$ is feasible only for $\delta \geq \left\lceil \frac{n-1}{2}\right\rceil$. For the one-agent case, we show a tight bound of $\Theta(\delta n)$ on the worst-case search time as well as competitive ratio of any online algorithm for treasure hunt, provided $\delta \geq 2n$. We then give an optimal algorithm for $k$ agents, thereby showing that $k$ agents can obtain a speedup of $k$ on the worst-case search time. Finally, in the R-VP setting, in which in every step, the vertices are arranged as a ring according to a random permutation, we show that treasure hunt takes expected $\Theta(n)$ steps against an oblivious adversary and $\Theta(n \log n)$ steps against an adaptive adversary.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

The Computing Channel: How Modulation Programs the Airwaves

Distributed computing and distributed artificial intelligence require frequent exchanges of intermediate results, although many applications need only an aggregate rather than messages from individual devices. Conventional systems recover each message before computing the aggregate, whereas over-the-air computation (OAC) exploits simultaneous transmission to obtain it directly. However, dominant OAC implementations rely on analog signaling, creating a mismatch with finite-precision data and digital communication procedures. This article presents digital function-oriented communication, in which finite-alphabet symbol representations and receiver decisions are jointly designed so that multiple-access superposition encodes the desired function without recovering individual inputs. We introduce its computational-constellation principle, main design approaches, extensions, and implementation challenges. Federated edge learning illustrates how the framework can reduce user-dependent data-bearing resources while operating directly on quantized model updates.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

Can AI Remediate Backend Failures Safely? GuardedAct with Blast-Radius-Aware Sandboxing

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in generating remediation actions for microservice failures. However, directly executing AI-generated repair actions in production risks cascading collateral damage. We propose GuardedAct, a sandbox-first remediation framework that interposes a blast-radius-aware verification layer between the LLM action generator and the production environment. GuardedAct operates in four phases: (1) ingesting a diagnosis report together with the live system topology and recent telemetry, (2) prompting an LLM to produce a ranked list of candidate remediation actions, (3) simulating each action in a lightweight digital-twin sandbox that estimates the blast radius and assigns a risk label, and (4) enforcing a rollback-confidence gate that auto-executes only low-risk actions while escalating high-risk ones for human review. We evaluate GuardedAct on five fault scenarios injected into the DeathStarBench social-network application. Experimental results show that GuardedAct achieves an overall recovery rate of 87.4% while reducing collateral damage by 79.7% relative to direct LLM execution (from 25.6% to 5.2%), at the cost of a modest sandbox-induced increase in mean time to recovery (approximately 8 s). Ablation studies confirm that each component contributes meaningfully to the safety-speed trade-off.

cs.DC↗