SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2501.15884

Galileo Galilei and Satellite Navigation

Abstract

In 1492, for the first time, an unknown ocean opened up before sailors: weeks of navigation and no idea how to pinpoint their location. Since ancient times, navigators had known how to determine latitude by using the North Star, but the "problem of longitude" was different. More than a century later, Galileo Galilei discovered in Padua Jupiter's satellites and quickly realized that a sailor who could observe their eclipses would know his own longitude. Yet his brilliant insight was 400 years ahead of the technology of his time. Impractical at sea, on land this idea became a formidable tool for cartography and ushered in the age of the image of the world. Today the technique can be realized thanks to artificial satellites, and the Tuscan genius' name has reached space with the European satellite system named Galileo. An exhibition in Paris, organized by the Permanent Representation of Italy to the International Organizations, Sorbonne University, and the Galileo Museum in Florence, and directed by Asia Ruffo di Calabria of the Musee des Arts et Metiers, by Quentin Cheval-Galland of the Sorbonne University, and by Alessandro De Angelis, allowed visitors to observe inventions of the time and some writings by Galileo on the theme of geolocation. The exhibition was held in Paris in June 2024. It was replicated in Prague in October 2024, in Amsterdam in December 2025, and at the Perimeter Institute in Waterloo, Canada, in February 2025.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alessandro De Angelis. 2025-01-27. Galileo Galilei and Satellite Navigation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15884

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Scientific Promise

Scientists constantly face decisions about what lines of research to pursue. This Element introduces the philosophical debate about scientific pursuitworthiness. It explains how it can be rational to pursue a theory even if the theory is less well supported than its rivals, and it discusses existing philosophical frameworks for guiding pursuit decisions. The Element also develops a new perspective. Existing accounts focus predominantly on theories, while experiments are largely neglected. This is an important shortcoming. Theoretical promise depends on experimental promise, and experimental promise raises questions of its own. Drawing on the epistemology of experimentation, the Element advances an account of experimental pursuitworthiness. It is argued that such pursuitworthiness depends on experimental virtues like a clear signal and simplicity of design. Moreover, the kinds of uncertainty that constrain the assessment of scientific pursuits are examined. Finally, the Element highlights open questions in the philosophy of scientific pursuitworthiness.

physics.hist-ph

Is Black Hole Evaporation Prediction Friendly?

Manchak and Weatherall (2018) formulate the black hole information paradox as a failure of predictability in black hole evaporation spacetimes, diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I offer a strategy for resolving this paradox. I argue that failures of predictability in black hole evaporation are not well diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I then consider two weakenings of global hyperbolicity: prediction and retrodiction friendliness, the failure of which could ground a new paradox. However, deidealized black hole evaporation models can be prediction and retrodiction friendly. Therefore, the information paradox cannot be based upon failures of global hyperbolicity, nor either retrodiction or prediction unfriendliness.

physics.hist-ph

The Crab Nebula progenitor: recovering the 1054 AD supernova event as galactic Gamma-ray burst

In 1054 AD a daytime star appeared in the constellation of Taurus, for three weeks, and it was reported in various sources from Europe to China/Japan: it was one of the few documented galactic supernovae of the last two millenia. This paradigm has been established about sixty years ago, as the comprehension of the physics of supernovae progressed with enough observational data. The Gamma-ray bursts were discovered in the same period, but only in the past few years have their observations become daily and their distances have been fully understood as cosmological. After the explosion, the exponential decay of the luminosity in gamma-rays and X-rays has been followed with telescopes onboard dedicated satellites. Also the exponential decay of the afterglow's optical and radio frequencies have been observed with the largest optical and radio telescopes. Within the binary-driven hypernova framework, successful in explaining all the observed phases of the Gamma-ray bursts, the universal exponential decay can be extended to 1000 years after the burst, to account for the present values of Gamma and X-rays as well as optical and radio frequencies of the Crab Nebula. Both the daytime visibility of the burst, and the simultaneous radiation plagues appeared in Constantinople and Cairo is a strong evidence of the presence of Gamma-rays in the lower atmosphere, coming from the same source originating the Crab nebula. The association to the daytime visibility of that star and the following plague meets exactly the etymology of the word dis-aster, bad star.

physics.hist-ph