Sequential Testing with Subadditive Costs

Blake Harris; Viswanath Nagarajan; Rayen Tan

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2501.18010

Sequential Testing with Subadditive Costs

Blake Harris·Viswanath Nagarajan·Rayen Tan

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the classic sequential testing problem, we are given a system with several components each of which fails with some independent probability. The goal is to identify whether or not some component has failed. When the test costs are additive, it is well known that a greedy algorithm finds an optimal solution. We consider a much more general setting with subadditive cost functions and provide a $(4\rho+\gamma)$-approximation algorithm, assuming a $\gamma$-approximate value oracle (that computes the cost of any subset) and a $\rho$-approximate ratio oracle (that finds a subset with minimum ratio of cost to failure probability). While the natural greedy algorithm has a poor approximation ratio in the subadditive case, we show that a suitable truncation achieves the above guarantee. Our analysis is based on a connection to the minimum sum set cover problem. As applications, we obtain the first approximation algorithms for sequential testing under various cost-structures: $(5+\epsilon)$-approximation for tree-based costs, $9.5$-approximation for routing costs and $(4+\ln n)$ for machine activation costs. We also show that sequential testing under submodular costs does not admit any poly-logarithmic approximation (assuming the exponential time hypothesis).

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Blake Harris, Viswanath Nagarajan, Rayen Tan. 2025-01-29. Sequential Testing with Subadditive Costs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗