Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2501.18105

Facility Location on High-dimensional Euclidean Spaces

Euiwoong Lee·Kijun Shin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recent years have seen great progress in the approximability of fundamental clustering and facility location problems on high-dimensional Euclidean spaces, including $k$-Means and $k$-Median. While they admit strictly better approximation ratios than their general metric versions, their approximation ratios are still higher than the hardness ratios for general metrics, leaving the possibility that the ultimate optimal approximation ratios will be the same between Euclidean and general metrics. Moreover, such an improved algorithm for Euclidean spaces is not known for Uncapaciated Facility Location (UFL), another fundamental problem in the area. In this paper, we prove that for any $\gamma \geq 1.6774$ there exists $\varepsilon > 0$ such that Euclidean UFL admits a $(\gamma, 1 + 2e^{-\gamma} - \varepsilon)$-bifactor approximation algorithm, improving the result of Byrka and Aardal. Together with the $(\gamma, 1 + 2e^{-\gamma})$ NP-hardness in general metrics, it shows the first separation between general and Euclidean metrics for the aforementioned basic problems. We also present an $(\alpha_{Li} - \varepsilon)$-(unifactor) approximation algorithm for UFL for some $\varepsilon > 0$ in Euclidean spaces, where $\alpha_{Li} \approx 1.488$ is the best-known approximation ratio for UFL by Li.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Euiwoong Lee, Kijun Shin. 2025-01-30. Facility Location on High-dimensional Euclidean Spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18105

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗