SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2502.02541

Optimal Security Response to Network Intrusions in IT Systems

Abstract

Cybersecurity is one of the most pressing technological challenges of our time and requires measures from all sectors of society. A key measure is automated security response, which enables automated mitigation and recovery from cyber attacks. Significant strides toward such automation have been made due to the development of rule-based response systems. However, these systems have a critical drawback: they depend on domain experts to configure the rules, a process that is both error-prone and inefficient. Framing security response as an optimal control problem shows promise in addressing this limitation but introduces new challenges. Chief among them is bridging the gap between theoretical optimality and operational performance. Current response systems with theoretical optimality guarantees have only been validated analytically or in simulation, leaving their practical utility unproven. This thesis tackles the aforementioned challenges by developing a practical methodology for optimal security response in IT infrastructures. It encompasses two systems. First, it includes an emulation system that replicates key components of the target infrastructure. We use this system to gather measurements and logs, based on which we identify a game-theoretic model. Second, it includes a simulation system where game-theoretic response strategies are optimized through stochastic approximation to meet a given objective, such as mitigating potential attacks while maintaining operational services. These strategies are then evaluated and refined in the emulation system to close the gap between theoretical and operational performance. We prove structural properties of optimal response strategies and derive efficient algorithms for computing them. This enables us to solve a previously unsolved problem: demonstrating optimal security response against network intrusions on an IT infrastructure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kim Hammar. 2025-02-04. Optimal Security Response to Network Intrusions in IT Systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02541

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT