SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2502.08656

Parable of the Parabola

Abstract

We study triangles and quadrilaterals which are inscribed in a circle and circumscribed about a parabola. Although these are particular cases of the celebrated Poncelet's Theorem, in this paper we {\it do not assume} the theorem but prove it along the way. Similarly, our arguments here \emph{are logically independent} from Cayley's condition, describing points of a finite order on an elliptic curve or any other use of the theory of elliptic curves. Instead, we use purely planimetric methods, including the Joachimsthal notation, to fully describe such polygons and associated circles and parabolas. We prove that a circle contains the focus of a parabola if and only if there is a triangle inscribed in the circle and circumscribed about the parabola. We prove that if the center of a circle coincides with the focus of a parabola, then there exists a quadrilateral inscribed in the circle and circumscribed about the parabola. We further prove that the quadrilaterals obtained in such a way are antiparallelograms. If the center of a circle does not coincide with the focus of a parabola, then a quadrilateral inscribed in the circle and circumscribed about the parabola exists if and only if the directrix of the parabola contains the point of intersection of the polar of the focus with respect to the circle with the line determined by the center and the focus. That point coincides with the intersection of the diagonals of any quadrilateral inscribed in the circle and circumscribed about the parabola. In particular, for a given circle and a confocal pencil of parabolas with the focus different than the center of the circle, there is a unique parabola for which there exists a quadrilateral circumscribed about it and inscribed in the circle.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Vladimir Dragović, Mohammad Hassan Murad. 2025-01-29. Parable of the Parabola. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exmath.2025.125717

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO