Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2502.15539

PtrHash: Minimal Perfect Hashing at RAM Throughput

Ragnar Groot Koerkamp
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a set $K$ of $n$ keys, a minimal perfect hash function (MPHF) is a collision-free bijective map $\mathsf{H_{mphf}}$ from $K$ to $\{0, \dots, n-1\}$. This work presents a (minimal) perfect hash function that first prioritizes query throughput, while also allowing efficient construction for $10^9$ or more elements using 2.4 bits of memory per key. Both PTHash and PHOBIC first map all $n$ keys to $n/\lambda < n$ buckets. Then, each bucket stores a pilot that controls the final hash value of the keys mapping to it. PtrHash builds on this by using 1) fixed-width (uncompressed) 8-bit pilots, 2) a construction algorithm similar to cuckoo-hashing to find suitable pilot values. Further, it 3) uses the same number of buckets and slots for each part, with 4) a single remap table to map intermediate positions $\geq n$ to $<n$, 5) encoded using per-cacheline Elias-Fano coding. Lastly, 6) PtrHash support streaming queries, where we use prefetching to answer a stream of multiple queries more efficiently than one-by-one processing. With default parameters, PtrHash takes 2.0 bits per key. On 300 million string keys, PtrHash is as fast or faster to build than other MPHFs, and at least $2.1\times$ faster to query. When streaming multiple queries, this improves to $3.3\times$ speedup over the fastest alternative, while also being significantly faster to construct. When using $10^9$ integer keys instead, query times are as low as 12 ns/key when iterating in a for loop, or even down to 8 ns/key when using the streaming approach, just short of the 7.4 ns inverse throughput of random memory accesses.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ragnar Groot Koerkamp. 2025-02-21. PtrHash: Minimal Perfect Hashing at RAM Throughput. https://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.sea.2025.21

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗