arXiv · 2502.20076
Purported quantitative support for multiple introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into humans is an artefact of an imbalanced hypothesis testing framework
Abstract
A prominent report claimed substantial support for two introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into humans using a calculation that combined phylodynamic inferences and epidemic models. Inspection of the calculation identifies an imbalance in the hypothesis testing framework that confounds this result; the single-introduction model was tested against more stringent conditions than the two-introduction model. Here, I show that when the two-introduction model is tested against the same conditions, the support disappears.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Angus McCowan. 2025-02-27. Purported quantitative support for multiple introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into humans is an artefact of an imbalanced hypothesis testing framework. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.20076
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.