SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2502.20164

At most n-valued maps

Abstract

This paper concerns various models of ``at-most-$n$-valued maps''. That is, multivalued maps $f:X\multimap Y$ for which $f(x)$ has cardinality at most $n$ for each $x$. We consider 4 classes of such maps which have appeared in the literature: $\mathcal U$, the set of exactly $n$-valued maps, or unions of such; $\mathcal F$, the set of $n$-fold maps defined by Crabb; $\mathcal S$, the set of symmetric product maps; and $\mathcal W$, the set of weighted maps with weights in $\mathbb N$. Our main result is roughly that these classes satisfy the following containments: \[ \mathcal U \subsetneq \mathcal F \subsetneq \mathcal S = \mathcal W \] Furthermore we define the general class $\mathcal C$ of all at-most-$n$-valued maps, and show that there are maps in $\mathcal C$ which are outside of any of the other classes above. We also describe a configuration-space point of view for the class $\mathcal C$, defining a configuration space $C_n(Y)$ such that any at-most-$n$-valued map $f:X\multimap Y$ corresponds naturally to a single-valued map $f:X\to C_n(Y)$. We give a full calculation of the fundamental group and homology groups of $C_n(S^1)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daciberg Lima Goncalves, Robert Skiba, P. Christopher Staecker. 2025-02-27. At most n-valued maps. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.20164

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN