SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2503.01147

A framework for boosting matching approximation: parallel, distributed, and dynamic

Abstract

This work designs a framework for boosting the approximation guarantee of maximum matching algorithms. As input, the framework receives a parameter $\epsilon > 0$ and an oracle access to a $\Theta(1)$-approximate maximum matching algorithm $\mathcal{A}$. Then, by invoking $\mathcal{A}$ for $\text{poly}(1/\epsilon)$ many times, the framework outputs a $1+\epsilon$ approximation of a maximum matching. Our approach yields several improvements in terms of the number of invocations to $\mathcal{A}$: (1) In MPC and CONGEST, our framework invokes $\mathcal{A}$ for $O(1/\epsilon^7 \cdot \log(1/\epsilon))$ times, substantially improving on $O(1/\epsilon^{39})$ invocations following from [Fischer et al., STOC'22] and [Mitrovic et al., arXiv:2412.19057]. (2) In both online and offline fully dynamic settings, our framework yields an improvement in the dependence on $1/\epsilon$ from exponential [Assadi et al., SODA25 and Liu, FOCS24] to polynomial.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Slobodan Mitrović, Wen-Horng Sheu. 2025-03-03. A framework for boosting matching approximation: parallel, distributed, and dynamic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01147

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS