Assessing Student Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence across Engineering Education from 2023 to 2024

Jesan Ahammed Ovi; Gabe Fierro; C. Estelle Smith

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2503.04696

Assessing Student Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence across Engineering Education from 2023 to 2024

Jesan Ahammed Ovi·Gabe Fierro·C. Estelle Smith

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools and models have the potential to re-shape educational needs, norms, practices, and policies in all sectors of engineering education. Empirical data, rather than anecdata and assumptions, on how engineering students have adopted GenAI is essential to developing a foundational understanding of students' GenAI-related behaviors and needs during academic training. This data will also help formulate effective responses to GenAI by both academic institutions and industrial employers. We collected two representative survey samples at the Colorado School of Mines, a small engineering-focused R-1 university in the USA, in May 2023 ($n_1=601$) and September 2024 ($n_2=862$) to address research questions related to (RQ1) how GenAI has been adopted by engineering students, including motivational and demographic factors contributing to GenAI use, (RQ2) students' ethical concerns about GenAI, and (RQ3) students' perceived benefits v.s. harms for themselves, science, and society. Analysis revealed a statistically significant rise in GenAI adoption rates from 2023 to 2024. Students predominantly leverage GenAI tools to deepen understanding, enhance work quality, and stay informed about emerging technologies. Although most students assess their own usage of GenAI as ethical and beneficial, they nonetheless expressed significant concerns regarding GenAI and its impacts on society. We collected student estimates of ``P(doom)'' and discovered a bimodal distribution. Thus, we show that the student body at Mines is polarized with respect to future impacts of GenAI on the engineering workforce and society, despite being increasingly willing to explore GenAI over time. We discuss implications of these findings for future research and for integrating GenAI in engineering education.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Jesan Ahammed Ovi, Gabe Fierro, C. Estelle Smith. 2025-03-06. Assessing Student Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence across Engineering Education from 2023 to 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04696

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

ShellVis: Sandboxed Live Programming for Shell Scripts

Live programming provides visibility to programmers by running and tracing programs as they are edited. However, for programs with potentially harmful side effects, liveness can turn mistakes into disasters. We propose enabling live programming in environments with side effects via sandboxing: confining effects to a simulation of the true environment. We apply sandboxed live programming in the challenging context of shell scripting: a ubiquitous and powerful---yet notoriously opaque and error-prone---tool. ShellVis provides line-by-line feedback on a shell script's run-time behavior, with file operations sandboxed via a safe overlay of the file system. A qualitative user evaluation finds ShellVis to be helpful to participants, replacing tedious existing practices and instilling confidence. Participant responses also reveal areas for future research, particularly bridging the gulf of execution alongside the gulf of evaluation. ShellVis serves as a case study of how sandboxing can bring live-programming techniques into the many real-world programming contexts where side effects are important.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Visual-Motion-Induced Modulation of Pedestrian Trajectories Using Spatially Distributed Multi-Display Signage in Public Spaces

Multi-display signage (MDS), now ubiquitous in urban environments, has the potential to influence human behavior and experience in public spaces. However, despite its unique capability to present spatially distributed dynamic visual stimuli, its current use is mainly limited to advertising. In this study, we propose a perception-based approach for laterally modulating pedestrian trajectories as a nonverbal means of guiding pedestrians in public spaces. The approach is motivated by vection, the illusion of self-motion, and uses laterally moving monochrome stripes, a standard stimulus in vection research, presented across spatially distributed displays to elicit postural responses that may bias pedestrian trajectories. We evaluated the approach through a controlled laboratory experiment and a real-world field deployment involving actual pedestrian flows in a national museum. The laboratory experiment examined whether the MDS setup induced trajectory shifts in the direction predicted by prior research on the behavioral effects of vection. The field deployment investigated whether comparable effects would emerge in aggregate pedestrian behavior during unconstrained movement under conditions closer to those of urban public spaces. In the laboratory, full-screen motion significantly biased walking trajectories in the direction of visual motion, whereas partial-stripe motion produced no significant directional effect. In the field deployment, opposing full-screen motion conditions produced direction-consistent differences in aggregate pedestrian positions. The field results, observed despite the substantial variability in real-world pedestrian flows, extend the controlled laboratory findings and provide ecologically valid evidence supporting practical MDS-based pedestrian modulation in public settings. The results further suggest that sufficient visual-motion coverage may be important.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Coding

The utility of AI in multi-coder qualitative coding has been widely discussed, yet little empirical evidence exists to delineate the contexts in which it performs reliably. We address this gap by quantifying the effectiveness of multi-agent LLM coding across varied qualitative datasets, revealing key contextual and structural factors that mediate coding outcomes. We developed a literature-informed baseline pipeline that enables AI agents to independently code, debate, and reconcile disagreements. Results revealed that coding accuracy depends on factors such as codebook length, qualitative data similarity, and agent disagreement. Notably, intense and unresolved debates between agents led to higher accuracy. Our analysis showed that while LLMs emulate many human discussion behaviors, they lack adaptive responsiveness to context. From these findings, we offer design recommendations for building automated coding systems. Our open-source AI discussion dataset and methodological framework lay the groundwork for advancing the design of AI-mediated automated thematic analysis.

cs.HC↗