SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2503.07240

Representative dietary behavior patterns and associations with cardiometabolic outcomes in Puerto Rico using a Bayesian latent class analysis for non-probability samples

Abstract

There is limited understanding of how dietary behaviors cluster together and influence cardiometabolic health at a population level in Puerto Rico. Data availability is scarce, particularly outside of urban areas, and is often limited to non-probability sample (NPS) data where sample inclusion mechanisms are unknown. In order to generalize results to the broader Puerto Rican population, adjustments are necessary to account for selection bias but are difficult to implement for NPS data. Although Bayesian latent class models enable summaries of dietary behavior variables through underlying patterns, they have not yet been adapted to the NPS setting. We propose a novel Weighted Overfitted Latent Class Analysis for Non-probability samples (WOLCAN). WOLCAN utilizes a quasi-randomization framework to (1) model pseudo-weights for an NPS using Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) and a reference probability sample, and (2) integrate the pseudo-weights within a weighted pseudo-likelihood approach for Bayesian latent class analysis, while propagating pseudo-weight uncertainty into parameter estimation. A stacked sample approach is used to allow shared individuals between the NPS and the reference sample. We evaluate model performance through simulations and apply WOLCAN to data from the Puerto Rico Observational Study of Psychosocial, Environmental, and Chronic Disease Trends (PROSPECT). We identify dietary behavior patterns for adults in Puerto Rico aged 30 to 75 and examine their associations with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. Our findings suggest that an out-of-home eating pattern is associated with a higher likelihood of these cardiometabolic outcomes compared to a nutrition-sensitive pattern. WOLCAN effectively reveals generalizable dietary behavior patterns and demonstrates relevant applications in studying diet-disease relationships.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stephanie M. Wu, Abrania Marrero, Matthew R. Williams, Terrance D. Savitsky, Josiemer Mattei, José Rodríguez-Orengo, Briana J. K. Stephenson. 2025-03-10. Representative dietary behavior patterns and associations with cardiometabolic outcomes in Puerto Rico using a Bayesian latent class analysis for non-probability samples. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07240

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME