SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2503.08051

Neutralizing Popularity Bias in LLM-based Recommendation via Counterfactual Reasoning Guidelines

Abstract

In the era of generative AI, recommender systems are moving from precise prediction to trustworthy generation. Large language models (LLMs) support this shift by inferring user interests and producing natural-language explanations. However, LLM-based recommendation suffers from a fundamental obstacle: popularity bias. Through pre-training on massive corpora, LLMs tend to rely on global statistics and trend signals, yielding recommendations that follow popularity rather than genuine preference. As this bias is entangled in model parameters and is hard to remove directly, we propose Neutralizing Popularity Bias in LLM-based Recommendation via Counterfactual Reasoning Guidelines (NPRec), a model-agnostic framework that mitigates popularity bias through external semantic intervention. NPRec performs counterfactual refinement to causally separate intrinsic user interests from popularity-driven conformity, producing debiased textual guidelines that reflect actual user preferences. These guidelines are injected at inference time to shift the LLM from unconstrained generation to guided reasoning, without any parameter updates. Serving as explicit premises, they both ground faithful explanations and improve recommendation quality. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that NPRec achieves promising performance in recommendation accuracy, explanation quality, and debiasing capability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Guanrong Li, Haolin Yang, Xinyu Liu, Zhen Wu, Rui Xia, Xinyu Dai. 2025-03-11. Neutralizing Popularity Bias in LLM-based Recommendation via Counterfactual Reasoning Guidelines. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08051

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI