Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2503.08385

Distributed Satellites Dynamic Allocation for Grids with Time Windows: A Potential Game Approach

Weiyi Yang·Yingwu Chen·Xiaolu Liu·Jun Wen·Lei He
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The allocation of tasks to a large number of distributed satellites is a difficult problem owing to dynamic changes in massive tasks and the complex matching of tasks to satellites. To reduce the complexity of the problem, tasks that are geographically close can be divided into a predefined grid with a specific time window and processed together. The problem then becomes a dynamic grid with time-window allocation problem (DGAP). To ensure consistent visibility between satellites and grids, the timeline of the DGAP is partitioned into several decision-making stages that are determined by dynamic changes in the time window. Subsequently, the DGAP can be resolved progressively adopting the potential game approach in the single-stage DGAP (sDGAP). First, to solve the discontinuity in the goal of the sDGAP, we approximate the goal by a smooth exponential sum function that we regard as the global utility function. Second, a potential game theoretic framework is constructed by decomposing this global utility function into the local utility functions of individuals. We prove that each Nash equilibrium of the proposed potential game is the optimal solution of the sDGAP. Third, to solve the potential game, a distributed algorithm, referred to as the selective time-variant better reply process (SeTVBRP) algorithm, is proposed and its convergence is proved. The SeTVBRP algorithm is an improved algorithm based on the better reply process algorithm, where two improvement methods (i.e., the selective action method and time-variant parameter method) are introduced. Through factor analysis, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the two improvement methods for the sDGAP. Last, numerical results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms existing learning algorithms and is effective in solving the DGAP.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Weiyi Yang, Yingwu Chen, Xiaolu Liu, Jun Wen, Lei He. 2025-03-11. Distributed Satellites Dynamic Allocation for Grids with Time Windows: A Potential Game Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08385

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗