SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2503.08910

Finitely additive measures on Boolean algebras

Abstract

In this article, we conduct a detailed study of \emph{finitely additive measures} (fams) in the context of Boolean algebras, focusing on three specific topics: freeness and approximation, existence and extension criteria, and integration theory. In the first topic, we present a classification of \emph{free} finitely additive measures, that is, those for which the measure of finite sets is zero, in terms of approximation to uniform probability measures. This inspires a weaker version of this notion, which we call the \emph{uniform approximation property}, characterized in terms of freeness and another well-determined type of fams we call \emph{uniformly supported}. In the second topic, we study new criteria for the existence and extension of finitely additive measures. In particular, we provide an extension of the so-called \emph{compatibility theorem} -- which characterizes when two finitely additive measures can be extended -- yielding a precise and compact characterization of when three finitely additive measures can be simultaneously extended, under the assumption that one of them is an ultrafilter. Finally, we study a Riemann-type integration theory on fields of sets with respect to finitely additive measures, allowing us to extend and generalize some classical concepts and results from real analysis, such as Riemann integration over rectangles in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ and the Jordan measure. We also generalize the extension criteria for fams allowing desired values of integrals of a given set of functions. At the end, we explore the connection between integration in fields of sets and the Lebesgue integration in the Stone space of the corresponding field, where we establish a characterization of integrability in the sense of the Lebesgue-Vitali theorem, which follows as a consequence of our results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Miguel A. Cardona, Diego A. Mejía, Andrés F. Uribe-Zapata. 2025-03-11. Finitely additive measures on Boolean algebras. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08910

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO