Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2503.10161

MorphisHash: Improving Space Efficiency of ShockHash for Minimal Perfect Hashing

Stefan Hermann
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A minimal perfect hash function (MPHF) maps a set of n keys to unique positions {1, ..., n}. Representing an MPHF requires at least 1.44 bits per key. ShockHash is a technique to construct an MPHF and requires just slightly more space. It gives each key two pseudo random candidate positions. If each key can be mapped to one of its two candidate positions such that there is exactly one key mapped to each position, then an MPHF is found. If not, ShockHash repeats the process with a new set of random candidate positions. ShockHash has to store how many repetitions were required and for each key to which of the two candidate positions it is mapped. However, when a given set of candidate positions can be used as MPHF then there is not only one but multiple ways of mapping the keys to one of their candidate positions such that the mapping results in an MPHF. This redundancy makes up for the majority of the remaining space overhead in ShockHash. In this paper, we present MorphisHash which is a technique that almost completely eliminates this redundancy. Our theoretical result is that MorphisHash saves {\Theta}(ln(n)) bits compared to ShockHash. This corresponds to a factor of 20 less space overhead in practice. The technique to accomplish this might be of a more general interest to compress data structures.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stefan Hermann. 2025-03-13. MorphisHash: Improving Space Efficiency of ShockHash for Minimal Perfect Hashing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10161

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗