Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2503.11847

A Spiral Bicycle Track that Can Be Traced by a Unicycle

Stan Wagon
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A unibike curve is a track that can be made by either a bicycle or a unicycle. More precisely, the end of a unit tangent vector at any point on a unibike curve lies on the curve (so the bike's front wheel always lies on the track made by the rear wheel). David Finn found such a curve in 2002, but it loops around itself in an extremely complicated way with many twists and self-intersections. Starting with the polar square root curve r = sqrt[t/(2 pi)] and iterating a simple construction involving a differential equation apparently leads in the limit to a unibike curve having a spiral shape. The iteration gets each curve as a rear track of its predecessor. Solving hundreds of differential equations numerically, where each depends on the preceding one, leads to error buildup, but with some care one can get a curve having unibike error less than 10^-7. The evidence is strong for the conjecture that the limit of the iteration exists and is a unibike curve.

Explore related subjects

math.DG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stan Wagon. 2025-03-14. A Spiral Bicycle Track that Can Be Traced by a Unicycle. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11847

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The $q$-deformed cross-ratio: modular invariants and Coxeter friezes

We introduce and study a scalar $q$-deformation of the cross-ratio on $\mathbb P^1(\mathbb Q)$. Our construction is based on the notion of $q$-deformed rational numbers due to Morier-Genoud and the author. The $q$-cross-ratio is invariant under $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$, while elements of determinant $-1$ of $\mathrm{PGL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ act by $q\mapsto q^{-1}$. A principal result is its relation to $q$-deformed Coxeter friezes associated with rational polygons. The expansion at $q=e^h$ yields an algebraically independent sequence of modular invariants and relative invariants, although this sequence does not separate modular orbits. We compute the first two nonconstant coefficients of this expansion explicitly.

math.DG↗
arXiv2026

The Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in dimension five

We show that the sharp Euclidean isoperimetric inequality holds for domains in complete simply connected Riemannian $5$-manifolds of nonpositive sectional curvature, which establishes the Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in that dimension. The main step is a sharp inequality for constant-mean-curvature hypersurfaces, proved via integrals over pairs of boundary points, in the spirit of Banchoff-Pohl, together with an estimate for Jacobi fields along geodesic chords. The inequality persists for boundaries of isoperimetric regions in geodesic balls, whose mean curvature is constant only on the free part. An isoperimetric-profile argument, after Kleiner, completes the proof. Our method also gives a new proof in dimension $3$.

math.DG↗
arXiv2026

On static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential

We study complete static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential. Our main result shows that, under a natural lower bound relating the scalar curvature and the boundary mean curvature, a simple static manifold with boundary must in fact have positive scalar curvature, negative boundary mean curvature, and be compact; we also obtain explicit relations and estimates involving the volume of the manifold and the geometry of its boundary. In the scalar-flat case, we prove global splitting and Ricci-flat rigidity results, including for disconnected boundary, while in the negative scalar curvature case we establish a sharp mean-curvature bound and characterize the equality case by an exponential warped-product structure. The proofs rely essentially on the study of the associated Einstein manifold. In appendix we derive several identities for static manifolds with boundary and discuss the associated Einstein manifold technique in the boundaryless setting.

math.DG↗